Compare your options
Honest comparisons of the ways to share and collaborate on AI-generated apps, and when each one is the right call.
The best ways to share AI-generated apps (2026)
Five ways to share an app your AI built, compared honestly: screenshots, sending the file, built-in share links, self-hosting, and collaboration links. Which fits when.
Sharing a Claude artifact link: limits and alternatives
Claude's artifact links are view-only, live on Claude's domain, and collect no feedback. Here's exactly where the built-in sharing stops and what to use when you hit each wall.
Claude Artifacts now do public links and multiplayer editing. Read the fine print.
In July 2026 Claude added public artifact links and real-time multiplayer editing. Both are real, and they were kept apart on purpose. Here's the exact line, and what still needs a layer on top.
Claude Code Artifacts: sharing limits and what to do instead
Claude Code Artifacts turn a coding session into a live shareable page, but the link only opens for people signed into your Anthropic org. Here's the wall and the fix.
Codex Sites vs Coedit: sharing an AI-built app outside your company
OpenAI's Codex Sites builds and hosts an app from a prompt, but every viewer must be in your ChatGPT workspace. Here's what it does well and where it can't help.
Coedit vs sending a screenshot of your AI app
The screenshot is the real competitor: instant, universal, and it throws away everything interactive. An honest comparison of when a picture is enough and when it costs you.
How to collaborate on AI apps across Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini
Your team builds with different AI tools, and each one shares differently. The fix: standardize on the output format, not the generator, and review everything in one place.
When to use Claude Artifacts (and when not to)
Claude Artifacts shine while the work is between you and Claude: prototypes, personal tools, exploring data. Here's exactly where they stop, and what to use past that line.